(January 17, 2015 at 1:57 pm)Rhythm Wrote: That's your claim. You decided that they were, not me. Your constant attempts to shift the focus make your "argument" transparent. My position is irrelevant, regardless of what it may be.
No...you introduced this concept of procedural gen to thread and you were being cagey with it. So in an attempt to see where you were going, I said sure a evolution is a procedural gen. If you asked me if a car was a collection of atoms...I would agree that it is too. Now if your going to tell me that the moon is a car because it is a collection of atoms like a car is, I am going to call you out for being ridiculous.