(January 18, 2015 at 1:55 pm)Heywood Wrote: I'm not insisting that it does. I am claiming there is reason to believe that it does because when you observe the implementation of evolutionary systems...in every observation you can find the involvement of an intellect. What good reason exists to claim that it doesn't?
Because how evolution works does not require an intellect.
Without an intellect evolution sill works.
To adding intellect to the theory of evolution is not a requirement.
Adding intellect to evolution would be surplus to requirements.
If you study evolution you will find no need to add intelligence.
The reasons for this have been explained to you many many times but you just come back to square one each time.
This is a trend I have noticed in you and snowy, you both try to win arguments by just saying the last thing and not caring if it is true on in any defensible.
My dad has the same arguing technique which he also backs up with shouting.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
