RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
January 18, 2015 at 4:22 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2015 at 4:31 pm by helyott.)
your point 2 is a implausible argument.
The aim of this argument is to prove that there is an architect.
Where is the architect ? A proof ?
Your argument is useless and needless.
I don't argue there is an architect. You argue this.
You must prove this.
" whenever we observe an evolutionary system come into existence we always observe an intellect involved in that implementation "... Have you some exemples of evolutionary system come into existence ? ? ? I mean real evolutionary systems... Not computer system or that kind of stuff that is an artificial création i want a evolutionary system with true living organism not created bye human kind ?
I guess it will be difficult to find.
The aim of this argument is to prove that there is an architect.
Where is the architect ? A proof ?
Your argument is useless and needless.
I don't argue there is an architect. You argue this.
You must prove this.
" whenever we observe an evolutionary system come into existence we always observe an intellect involved in that implementation "... Have you some exemples of evolutionary system come into existence ? ? ? I mean real evolutionary systems... Not computer system or that kind of stuff that is an artificial création i want a evolutionary system with true living organism not created bye human kind ?
I guess it will be difficult to find.
If God is the answer to your question, it means that you have asked the wrong question.
A good question always ask how never why.
A good question always ask how never why.
