RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
January 18, 2015 at 4:30 pm
(This post was last modified: January 18, 2015 at 4:35 pm by Heywood.)
(January 18, 2015 at 4:22 pm)helyott Wrote: your point 2 is a implausible argument.
The aim of this argument is to prove that there is an architect.
Where is the architect ? A proof ?
Your argument is useless and needless.
I don't argue there is an architect. You argue this.
You must proove this bigot.
If point 2 is an implausible argument, falsify it by providing an example that is contrary to it. Just saying it is an implausible argument says nothing of substance.
(January 18, 2015 at 4:22 pm)helyott Wrote: whenever we observe an evolutionary system come into existence we always observe an intellect involved in that implementation... Have you some exemples of evolutionary system come into existence ? ? ? I mean real evolutionary systems... Not computer system or that kind of stuff that is an artificial création i want a evolutionary system with true living organism not created bye human kind ?
I guess it will be difficult to find.
Computer simulated evolution is real evolution as far as I am concerned. It simulates biological evolution by evolving variables encoded into a computer program.
But I have presented the game Chinese Whispers as an example of an evolutionary system which is not biological nor does it run on a computer(although Rhythm would say it does because to him essentially every bit of matter is computer(thats the jist of the word salad he spews as far as I can tell)).
