(January 19, 2015 at 3:25 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Except that no ones simply asserted it. It's been explained to you, at length, multiple times - with reference. This thread exists Heywood, and is now 58 pages long......
Hows about that little numbered list - while we're on the topic of observation, feel any need to readdress any part of that? Like the part that says "even if true"?
(meanwhile, no one actually has to provide you with what you're demanding - it's been provided out of conversational courtesy)
No it hasn't been explained. You've simply spent 58 pages asserting it. It is really simple Rhythm. Falsify my claim by presenting an observation of an evolutionary system coming into existence without intellects. They best you have done is a river system and that isn't even close to being an evolutionary system. Here....I will even format it for you.
Write something like this:
________ is an evolutionary system which has been observed to come into existence without an intellect. It is an evolutionary system because it has these elements or their equivalents of evolutionary systems. Those elements are: Replication, Heritable traits, Change, and Selection.
Can you do that for me? Can you put something in that blank for me to evaluate instead of simply asserting for 58 pages that there is something in that blank?