Detecting design or intent in nature

[bennyboy]

I already have, but you're committed to claiming that this thread doesn't exist - so that's probably not very helpful, eh?

Quote your post where you gave a specific example of a procedural generation that is also an evolutionary system that didn't require an intellect to be implemented so that it can be evaluated.

Julia did it(turned out to require intellect), Stimbo did it(wasn't observed to not require intellect....only asserted)....why can't you?

Cause you can't.

Heywood, you're not only like a parrot, in that you keep repeating the same thing. You're a deaf parrot.

There are a few ways we could proceed. We could just start responding to every post of yours with the name of the logical fallacy that it represents. We could just start copy-pasta-ing the many posts in which your false analogy has been called a false analogy.

You are trying to force us to give examples of design in a man-made evolutionary system (no duh?), with the hope of establishing that an evolutionary system which existed long before man was also created by an intellect.

Do you actually not see how fallacious this line of reasoning is, or are you just screaming into pillow because the sounds coming from outside your little window frighten you too much? If so, I understand. Reality is a scary thing-- it's big, full of mystery, and mostly out of our control. Probably none of us is capable of fully comprehending the terrors of our universe.

But when feeling safe requires constantly and diligently ignore the basic rules of logic, then Houston, we have a problem.