Detecting design or intent in nature

[bennyboy]

Begging.

The.

Question.

Is.

Bad.

Logic.

---

Evolution is not a system just like accidents are not a system.

Yeah, I said that. I said evolution is a process. Systems which use the process of evolution can be called evolutionary systems. You can't find observations which support proposition 2. Instead of being honest with yourself and coming to grips with the fact that there are certain observations(or lack thereof) of reality which conflict with your world view, you are trying to find fault with the propositions. This nit picking is really grasping at straws.

If you don't like "system" then toss it out. It doesn't help you. Consider these two propositions instead:

Proposition 1: all initial implementations of the process of evolution require intellects.
Proposition 2: all initial implementations of the process of evolution do not require intellects.

Please present an observation which supports the modified proposition 2. Your bacteria example doesn't work because you did not observe the initial implementation of that process which resulted in bacteria eating nylon.

Proposition 3: all initial implementations of the process of evolution require yin/yang.
Proposition 4: all initial implementations of the process of evolution do not require yin yang.
Proposition 5: all initial implementations of the process of evolution require a 12th dimension.
Proposition 6: all initial implementations of the process of evolution do not require a 12th dimension.

Prove that Propositions 4 and 6 are false. You can't. Why oh why can't you understand that making shit up and then demanding that someone disprove your made-up shit is a logic fail?