The M-UE did get the early conditions possibly wrong. That said, the materials necessary at the time existed, and numerous other possible mixes of the amounts have also resulted in amino acids being created, meaning that while the specific variables may not be precise, they seem to result in the same result very often; meaning absolute precision is not required. Now, the problem is you are asking is that we somehow make a scientific observation, without the application of science. The problem with this is you are asking for us to seek the beginning of evolution in an environment in which evolution already has happened, and the original environment in which it started no longer exists. The bar is actually far too high. Impossibly high, in fact. The conditions for organic life to come into existence can only be replicated in a laboratory environment. However, the laboratory environment is the recreation of that environment, meaning it demonstrated how it happened in the past. In essence, it is looking back in time by constructing an experiment that uses what we know of early Earth's environment, and letting it do its own thing. The materials that were there in Earth's infancy are placed together, and we see it happen. As amino acids are the very basis for the DNA virtually all Terran life uses, and the process of biological evolution is observed all the time, then the only conclusion is that evolution came into being without intelligent basis.
I've given you your proof. Whether or not you like it, it is an observation of that non-intelligent evolution. Whether or not it is replicated by intelligence means nothing; it is simply a reproduction of what happened, a demonstration of what happened to begin the process of evolution.
I've given you your proof. Whether or not you like it, it is an observation of that non-intelligent evolution. Whether or not it is replicated by intelligence means nothing; it is simply a reproduction of what happened, a demonstration of what happened to begin the process of evolution.
