(January 26, 2015 at 3:44 pm)Heywood Wrote:(January 25, 2015 at 7:27 pm)Surgenator Wrote: This is not how evolution works, and this one of many reasons your automobile example fails.
If you need example of automobile evolution that looks more closely like biological evolution, take a look at this:
1) In 1953 to 1955 the back bumper got shorter but then jump back to elonged version in 1956. Evolution can't do that.
2) What the fuck happen between 1960-1961? Did a bastard child became the main lineage?
3) Did someone chopped off the rear of the 1962 decendent?
4) Did the 1967 just sprouted an spoiler out of nowhere? Where is my small changes over time.
I can go on but thank you for pointing out how cars are do not follow the rules of evolution, specifically the accumalated changes.