determinism versus indeterminism

[DD_8630]

What I call statistic you call probabilistic but they are essentially the same feature of physical laws because the very notion of "possibility"or "probability" does not implicate total indeterminism but leaves open a factor to be completed for the whole of the picture which
is just determinism.

Hmm, I disagree. We say that shuffling cards of flipping coins is 'random', but only insofar as we our brains can't keep up with the mechanics of what's happening: we could, potentially, model the coin classically and determine whether heads or tails will come up.
However, there is the added complication of quantum mechanics: there is a tiny (but non-zero) chance that the coin will do something quantum in the air, and the result will be different to what we classically expect.

This is what I mean by the universe being ultimately indeterminate. Macroscopic phenomena are deterministic only insofar as they have a very have probability of agreeing with the predictions of classical mechanics. When you get right down to it, there is an extraordinarily slim chance that, say, the underwear of that woman will 'pop' five feet to the left.

It is in this way that the universe is indeterminate: you cannot say with complete confidence what will happen to a given system at some arbitrary time in the future.

I still affirm that most,if not all,laws of the universe and especially those concerning life are of a statistic (probabilistic) nature meaning the they
are subject to both deterministic and indeterministic features.
In my opinion one shall not oppose within a physical law determinism versus indetreminism but rather speak of a duality of them.

I'm not sure we're using the word 'determinism' and 'indeterminism' in the same way. When you say something has 'deterministic' features, what exactly do you mean?