RE: Detecting design or intent in nature
January 31, 2015 at 3:40 pm
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2015 at 3:44 pm by Chas.)
(January 31, 2015 at 3:34 pm)Heywood Wrote: What you and Chas are claiming is that we can't learn anything about the composition of the Big Set unless we examine every element of it.....and that is just false. We can draw conclusions about the Big Set by looking at all the elements available to us.
Nope, that is not what I claim because that was not your argument.
You have now made a new claim which is not equivalent. It has, however, some of the same flaws as your first argument.
You have yet to justify calling evolution a system or that it requires implementation.
You have not understood that the things you claim as 'evolutionary systems' are not equivalent to biological evolution.
You are so emotionally attached to your god premise that reason escapes you.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.