(February 4, 2015 at 2:36 pm)Heywood Wrote: Your definition defines a set. My definition defines a different set. Inspecting elements of your set allows you to draw conclusions about your set. Inspecting elements in your set does not allow you to draw conclusions about my set.Well, please don't stop being skeptical now. Since you've insisted that all the examples you observed were created by beings with either a vagina or a penis, your abuse of logic also demands that the designer of biological evolution had a vagina or a penis. My guess is vagina. Yours?
Now the definition of my set is not very narrow. It certainly isn't designed by me to filter out non intellect created evolutionary systems. I simply took a reasonable definition of evolution and now I am inspecting elements of the set it defines. Its not my fault that so far they all turn out to require intellect to come into existence and I shouldn't turn a blind eye to what I observe simply to avoid offending your atheistic faith.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza