Detecting design or intent in nature

[Chas]

The fuck I don't understand. Go back to page 94 and look again at your post #944. My waterfall example perfectly represents the argument you're making.

You're backtracking now, but you're argument still doesn't work. We dug the Panama Canal so I'm quite confident we can re-route a river to a nearby cliff if we wanted to. Does this mean that Niagra and other falls must be man-made? That's now your argument and it's still ridiculous.

No back tracking Cato.

The argument I made on page one is the same argument I am making on page 99. It is the same argument I proved in this thread

http://atheistforums.org/thread-30716.html

The only thing you have proved is that your conclusion seems likely to you.