So did Atheism + bite the dust?

[TheMessiah]

Yes mixed with Marxism, cultural Marxism and other conservative white supremacist and homophobic bullshit. Not to mention some quotes are actually not bad. For example the quote about getting rid of traditional marriage isn't to say heterosexual marriage is bad, it is a means to tell people what women shouldn't subjected to conservative views of being a housewife as a social obligation.

You claim you read them yet make a point which is completely unrelated? The website made two quotes about Marxism. This does not make it Conservative. This simply means it is analyzing Marxism. Some quotes are not bad, but while others are simply utterly ridiculous; those are the quotes which give Feminism a bad rep, despite the fact that they are a minority, they have the vocal platform to deem themselves Feminists; hence the term Feminazi successfully divides them.

Capitalism has helped oppress women for many centuries.

I agree. Racism and sexism were the underpinnings of Capitalism.

But that doesn't mean capitalism is the source - The source are stupid tiny dick syndrome men.

I did not argue it was the source; Marxist-Feminists argue that Capitalism is the source of patriarchy. The men that abuse women physically and economically, from a Marxist-Feminist standpoint (not my own) are actually men who have been exploited by Capitalism and thus abuse women because of their own frustration.

Yes on tumblr and youtube channels. Other than that there's not many feminist organizations, magazines, writers and so on that could be considered "radical"

Not just on Tumblr and You-Tube; they have a media voice. Gloria Steinem is an example of one during the first wave, was an advocate for radical Feminist and she is one of the more known Feminists. Radical Feminists have been given a media platform in America because their controversy attract more viewership.

The public perception of Feminism is degraded by the radicals.

Nuclear family is a term fuelled by conservatives and the religious that is code to promote traditional gender roles.

The Nuclear Family is derives from Sociology. It once promoted traditional gender roles in the 1960s but that is a thing of the past, they do however accept traditional gender roles but the majority of women are now expected for employment. Capitalism has simply evolved to the point where a female workforce is now needed.

There's nothing wrong with traditional roles to women who wish to have those roles.

AKA women are submissive, men are breadwinners and dominant, gays are destroying and oppressing straights, interracial marriage is evil, etc.

Now you are just generalizing. The majority of Conservatives do not voice opposition to inter-racial marriage in today's society; this is a thing of the past and the Left-wing have a history of opposing inter-racial marriage. Again, you seem to be outdated with your perceptions. Several Republican Governors are in fact, women.

Hell, in the country I live in, the Conservatives legalized Gay Marriage..

Something which Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, men of the Left-wing spectrum could not do because of their religious conviction.

Except that my link has studies disproving MRA studies.

Again, this is a double standard. I for one, linked a video to a re-nowed and respected Feminist who has 40 + years of experience and a P.H.D which fuels her credibility debunking the argument of Anita Sarkeesian and video-games causing sexism.

The responses you gave me in return, such as Factual-Feminist being Conservative (despite the fact that CH Sommers was a registered Democrat) were inadequate.

The fact they focus on fake rape accusations which are a minority and are not a relevant problem given that false accusations affect everyone, proves that they are more worried about making women look bad.

False rape accusations are a serious problem. They give leeway to women based on media sensitization of a crime. False accusations, which are found unworthy can still lead to men being unable to find jobs; despite the fact that they are innocent.

Not to mention they are illiterate and don't even know the cause of men's issues.

The majority of rights movements are not compromised authors, but ordinary individuals. That said, I am not sure being ''illiterate'' holds true if Feminism has legitimate loonies lurking around.

The cause of men's issues is not women

This is not the point men's rights movement make...

It's men who promote the concept of masculinity and gender roles to further decide who's a real man and not - Because of that men have the upper hand in power and strength but when it comes to children they have the lower hand because women are classified as caregivers. This is something feminists dislike because it's a double standard

Okay, firstly let's clarify something. Men have the upper hand in strength because they are biologically stronger; they evolved that way before the social construct of gender roles even existed.

Secondly, that is exactly what men's rights movement do. If women advocate against gender roles, then why do they openly abuse this privilege to get custody of the kids and the house? This is what the men's rights movement point out. That Feminists will despise gender roles yet still abuse it when need be.

What's wrong with not wanting to take part with an organization that has been accused of sexism, misogyny, homophobia and holding ultra-conservative viewpoints?

This did not answer my question. The MRA's are not ultra-Conservative, at all. They solely exist to counteract the contradictions behind Feminism.

The point is that you're throwing around Conservatism as if it's an insult, whenever I linked to Factual-Feminist or posted a link with quotes, all you have said is ''Conservative!''.