So did Atheism + bite the dust?

[TheMessiah]

Curiously this is an institution that works in America so it's irrelevant what conservatives in your country have done. I showed you facts and linked websites that show controverse or irrational positions from the American Enterprise Institute that makes them a non reliable source much like AnswersInGenesis;

No, you did not show facts; you have shown a blatant bias when forming argument. The fact that you referred to the stereotype of ''Conservatives hate gays and love traditional gender roles!'' is evidence of this. You are using outdated information to attempt to undermine the validity of a source whose ideology does not match your own. This is an extremely bias way of thinking and arguing.

Using that stereotype of Conservatives to fit your narrative is an argument from fallacy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy

I also showed you irrational positions from Anita Sarkeesian; flat out proving that she was a liar, yet you neglect to acknowledge such. TheAmericanEnterpriseInstitutue cannot be compared to a Creationist website because the Creationist website has no formal grounding in reality.

I also pointed out that some of the quotes are made up and that most of them are from Andrea something (a woman that is not regarded as the best feminist of all time by other feminists) -

...Did you read my post? I know some of them are made up. Hence why I pointed out a specific portion of the anti-Misogyny website which said ''many of them are indeed accurate'' --- that website debunked the false ones yet acknowledge many are true.

My dislike for Conservatism is not the main influence

Stereotyping to bad mouth the philosophy behind it indicates otherwise...

- I provided links that show studies directly contradicting what some conservatives try to claim (such as that rape numbers are a scam by women) and I provided links that debunk MRA's.

Yes, but again, read my posts. You are making an argument from fallacy. Because the MRA's have said one thing wrong, then their entire argument is therefore false. This is untrue; it's akin to saying because Richard Dawkins made one mistake, his entire argument is incorrect. This makes no logical sense. My point was that the MRA's tackle the gender issues when it comes to women abusing their power to win the house/kids, etc.