(February 10, 2015 at 10:43 am)Dystopia Wrote: MRA's don't tackle issues effectively and I've linked you about 5 websites that show examples of how they attempt to demonize and discriminate women by making them look like whores and gold diggers and how they're illiterate when addressing men's issues (in fact, conquests in men's issues and higher men's rights have been made by feminists and I've linked you that as well). Do you have any relevant credible source for your points? If not, either refute or GTFO
Fallacies? You've been committing the so called confirmation bias over and over and over again - You quote sources that support your views and ignore those that don't. Educate yourself.
I don't see how Sarkeesian is relevant, I never said I support her, I just said getting threats is wrong. I can discuss gaming with my own brain without need a person telling me how to think. I can discuss -isms in gaming with my observations solely - I don't need to quote sources because some assertions require simply a little of logical reasoning
1. Again, read my posts. I do not care about whether they make fallacies, I am arguing that they identify gender related bias towards men; they needn't necessarily effectively act upon them. Your argument is that from fallacy --- because they have failed to address men's issues, then this means their entire organization is not legitimate. This is not only a dangerous argument but one which lacks decent sense.
2. No, I did not. I quoted a pro-Feminist website to back up my view; this is not ''quoting bias sources''
3. If we go back in pages, we see that you attempted to defend her critique of gaming, despite the fact that she contradicted her own argument and destroyed it? Yes, getting threats is wrong. Quoting supports helps logical reasoning because evidence > opinion.
