RE: Non-overlapping magesteria
February 18, 2015 at 3:50 am
(This post was last modified: February 18, 2015 at 3:52 am by robvalue.)
My point was that if you are interested in finding out the truth of a claim, science is the only way to do it. There is no "other system" which can take over when science cannot "deal with" the claim. It's the claim that is the problem if science cannot deal with it. Usually because it's unfalsifiable.
If your "other system" has any inherent logic and consistent methodology, then it is scientific. It may be a really bad attempt at science and utterly flawed however. Which is what happens when you try to prove unfalsifiable claims.
If your "other system" has any inherent logic and consistent methodology, then it is scientific. It may be a really bad attempt at science and utterly flawed however. Which is what happens when you try to prove unfalsifiable claims.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum