(February 24, 2015 at 5:59 am)bennyboy Wrote:Alex already answered this one.(February 24, 2015 at 1:47 am)Surgenator Wrote: In the relativity equations you will be dividing by zero if you go into the photon's rest frame. Thats what makes it invalid.Doesn't calculus take care of that for us via limits?
Quote:That is hard question to answer since it depends if. your taken the general relativity approach or QM approach. In general relativity, space-time is curved so there was no interaction with the photon. In QM approach, the photon would interact with the graviton. So maybe. I don't know my feynman diagrams for graviton-photon interaction.Quote:The number of interactions that happen to the photon is independent of the reference frame. The time between two or more interactions would be spaced differently for different reference frames. Moving reference frame would see a smaller time difference between interactions compared to the stationary one. In the photon reference frame, all the interactions occurred at once which would break causality if the photon didn't get destroyed with each interaction.So a photon gets exactly one interaction-- its absorption into a receiving body. Does this mean, then, that passing through gravity fields (which will have changed as the photon "moves" in our reference frame) does not count as an interaction? It certainly would seem to affect what specific body is going to get to aborb the photon.
Quote:Two problems, the photon reference frame in an invalid frame and the number of possible interactions have to be equal independent of the frame.Quote:Imagine a photon starting on the trajectory toward your eye. Midway between galaxies, a flying black hole and photon have a close encounter. The black hole would change the trajectory of the photon.Ah yes, but from the photon's reference frame, the distance between it and your eye is 0. In other words, as soon as it is brought into existence, it is already at your eye, meaning that nothing COULD have intervened which would have prevented it from reaching your eye.
Your also making another fallacy where your assuming that because a photon hit your eye it was destined to hit your eye. There are countless photons that are on a trajectory toward your eye right now, so why are you not blinded by them? Answer.