My blog

[robvalue]

I really don't get it, I'm sorry. I'm trying very hard.

What I am saying in my blog is that atheism is not necessarily gnostic atheism. I don't know how much clearer that can be... They are not the same thing, one is a subset of the other but they are not equivalent. It's the most common misunderstanding of all to equate them.

An atheist who likes sweets is a sweet-liking atheist, still a form of atheism. But not all atheists necessarily like sweets. I don't think anywhere I say that an atheist is not a gnostic atheist. But I'll read it all again. Thanks for the feedback

As for the coin thing... It's meant to demonstrate that you can reject both "a is true" and "not a is true". If you don't have what you consider enough evidence to make a conclusive decision either way, then you reject both of them. Maybe I'm not explaining myself well... If anyone else would like to chime in, is what I've written confusing?