Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2025, 6:31 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fine Tuning Argument
#9
RE: Fine Tuning Argument
[quote='The_Flying_Skeptic' pid='88245' dateline='1282352013']
[quote]quote]
What do you think?
[/quote]
The fine tuning argument is the latest attempt to prove god from inferring design. It has a number of serious problems. The most obvious are that:
1 If the universe is truly deterministic then the 'chances' of events unfolding this way are 100% certain
2 It misuses probablity theory to say gee whizz look at how improbable this is. Improbable things happen all the time and continue to do so, it is an after the fact argument and has no predictive power
3 If true then its an argument against design as the universe needed fine tuning and wasn't perfect at creation
4 Even if true because of 3 above the designer wasn't perfect because he created something incompetently that it needed tuning
5 Even if true it says nothing for the designer, it could have been anything
6 It says nothing for the purpose of the universe. The most successful carbon based life is bacteria, the most prominent structures are black holes, and this universe is the most perfrect black hole generator
7 99.999999%+ of the universe is a very hostile place to us. What makes us think we were the object of it?
8 The universe is doomed to entropic heat death
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Fine Tuning Argument - by The_Flying_Skeptic - August 20, 2010 at 8:53 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by LastPoet - August 20, 2010 at 9:06 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Minimalist - August 20, 2010 at 9:33 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by NoGodaloud ? - August 21, 2010 at 12:03 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by The_Flying_Skeptic - August 22, 2010 at 3:23 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Welsh cake - August 21, 2010 at 6:28 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Eilonnwy - August 21, 2010 at 7:09 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by tackattack - August 21, 2010 at 7:59 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Eilonnwy - August 21, 2010 at 8:05 am
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Captain Scarlet - August 22, 2010 at 2:35 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by NoGodaloud ? - August 22, 2010 at 4:26 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by LastPoet - August 22, 2010 at 7:42 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by NoGodaloud ? - August 22, 2010 at 9:11 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by LastPoet - August 22, 2010 at 9:17 pm
RE: Fine Tuning Argument - by Captain Scarlet - September 2, 2010 at 5:52 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 19436 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Paraselene
  Signature in the Cell: DNA as Evidence for Design, beside Nature's Laws/Fine-Tuning. Nishant Xavier 54 9160 July 8, 2023 at 8:23 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  The not-so-fine tuning argument. Jehanne 38 11309 March 10, 2016 at 9:11 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Fine tuning of the multiverse? tor 8 2466 March 27, 2014 at 3:29 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Fine tuning argument assessed max-greece 99 34037 March 10, 2014 at 10:35 pm
Last Post: Rampant.A.I.
  The fine tuning argument solja247 68 27334 September 27, 2010 at 2:29 pm
Last Post: TheDarkestOfAngels



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)