Proof of God

[Esquilax]

The right way to say is:

Atheist: there is no God
Theist: Prove it.

If you have to lie about what your opponents say to win an argument, then you don't have much of a position.

You have my post and you are free to criticise. However, without logical reasoning, you sounds exactly "you don't know, but I'm going to claim I know the only possibility is no god, therefore no god."

I'm on record, multiple times, even in conversation with you, indicating that this is not my position. So you're either not reading my posts, or you're lying about what I think in order to gain some rhetorical advantage. Either way is a completely dishonest and shitty way to go about an argument.

Esquilax Wrote: Oh look, another proof of god that is only negative, boiling down to "you don't know, but I'm going to claim I know the only possibility is god, therefore god."

ChadWooters Wrote: Always setting up the same straw man, I see.

Perhaps you have some alternate of God.

So, here's another perfect demonstration that Harris is not reading what people are saying before he disagrees with them: Chad is another theist, agreeing with what Harris says, and yet Harris posts a response as though he's disagreeing. The man literally has no reading comprehension skills.