Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 16, 2025, 4:32 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Reverse Pascals Wager
#49
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager
godschild Wrote:Explain to me if you will how it's possible for a single cell creature with limited DNA to evolve upward into a different species that has more DNA, how is it possible to gain code.

Imagine the early earth. a primordial soup of organic matter, amino acids and other complex molecules bouncing around interacting, being stimulated by ultraviolet radiation and intense bursts of lightening, its a dynamic changing environment. Into this the first life was born simple,(probably).
Over time this developed probably a sexually gradually gaining in complexity, but what is certain that eventually this simple life would have become food for later life.

What you see today as a simple single celled creature has had exactly the same time to evolve as you have. its like comparing a spear to a space shuttle and saying their the same thing.

godschild Wrote:Why did the eye evolve if all the species were getting along without eye sight. How would it be possible to evolve eye sight with it being one of the most complicated systems.

oh for fuck sake read a book that isnt the bible for once, Darwin de-bunked this one two hundred years ago.
Creatures alive today have sensitive spots on their skin that react to light, this imparts an advantage over creatures that cant detect changes in light, (a sudden shadow might mean a predator is ovehead), from this you can evolve to where we are today, TA DA.

godschild Wrote:I believe the earth's systems are far to complicated for the trillions of trial and error accidents to have occurred in an order to reach today's earth systems before a disastrous occurance in the DNA coding would have at least limited the evolution of earth's systems to something far more primative.

Heres a revelation they dont have to all happen one after another, There are three trillion people on earth today each with differing DNA, theres three trillion evolutionary possibilties right there. does that help your math.(come on you can do it).

godschild Wrote:What was the need for color before eye sight.

Really you dont know?

Well for a start grass is green because grass needs all the other colours to photosynthesize so it is green as a waste product.

There are a million other reasons why things are the colur they are, READ A FUCKING BOOK.

godschild Wrote:Explain if you can the fabulous skin of the cuttlefish. Please do not give answers that make nature sound like it has a brain or a plan because we know that the evolutionary process can only be accidental processes. On and on I could go but we'll start with these simple questions first.
One more thing if you will, the skeletal structure of the hand is seen in many different species and it is quite effective in each one and every versatile in its design, so why is it that evolutionist use this to discount creation. Engineers use the wheel in many different inventions because it can serve a multitude of purposes so why would God not do the same with the skeletal structure of the hand.

the evolutionary process is not random chance, when will this finally sink in, Evolution is the process whereby if an adaption imparts some advantage no matter how small in the chance to reproduce then it will be carried forward and possibly amplified over time.

Example: imagine a drought, there is water in a sink well only the elephant with the longest trunks can get the, they survive, shorter trunk elephants die, so long trunked elephants mate with long trunked elephants and the trunks get bigger.

This is why natural disasters sometimes act as a spur to evolution.

As to the skeletal structure in the hand, its that way because it was that way in our distant ancestors.
Its down to our distant ancestors that we are lumbered with have a digestive/breathing tract that is interlinked with often fatal results, (although not detremental enough to have evolved it out)



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply



Messages In This Thread
Reverse Pascals Wager - by Captain Scarlet - August 20, 2010 at 2:27 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Tiberius - August 20, 2010 at 2:45 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Captain Scarlet - August 20, 2010 at 3:19 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Entropist - August 20, 2010 at 2:59 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Welsh cake - August 20, 2010 at 3:07 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Minimalist - August 20, 2010 at 3:13 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by DeistPaladin - August 20, 2010 at 3:26 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Godschild - August 21, 2010 at 12:54 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Zen Badger - August 21, 2010 at 10:51 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by DeistPaladin - August 23, 2010 at 10:11 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Godschild - August 23, 2010 at 8:44 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by DeistPaladin - August 23, 2010 at 9:27 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by RachelSkates - August 23, 2010 at 10:36 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Godschild - August 24, 2010 at 1:42 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by DeistPaladin - August 24, 2010 at 9:42 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Entropist - August 24, 2010 at 11:06 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by DeistPaladin - August 24, 2010 at 11:22 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Entropist - August 20, 2010 at 3:43 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Cego_Colher - August 20, 2010 at 4:03 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Paul the Human - August 20, 2010 at 4:10 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Minimalist - August 21, 2010 at 3:45 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Edwardo Piet - August 21, 2010 at 3:47 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Captain Scarlet - August 21, 2010 at 4:10 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by downbeatplumb - August 21, 2010 at 8:53 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Cego_Colher - August 21, 2010 at 10:04 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by fr0d0 - August 21, 2010 at 10:31 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Minimalist - August 21, 2010 at 5:54 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Tiberius - August 21, 2010 at 10:06 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Edwardo Piet - August 21, 2010 at 4:14 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Captain Scarlet - August 21, 2010 at 4:30 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Edwardo Piet - August 21, 2010 at 4:36 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Captain Scarlet - August 21, 2010 at 4:37 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Godschild - August 21, 2010 at 5:26 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Captain Scarlet - August 21, 2010 at 5:40 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Godschild - August 22, 2010 at 1:10 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Entropist - August 22, 2010 at 1:22 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by leo-rcc - August 22, 2010 at 5:55 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Captain Scarlet - August 22, 2010 at 6:38 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Minimalist - August 22, 2010 at 2:16 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Godschild - August 22, 2010 at 4:26 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Captain Scarlet - August 22, 2010 at 6:30 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Godschild - August 22, 2010 at 10:43 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Captain Scarlet - August 23, 2010 at 12:44 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Godschild - August 23, 2010 at 11:28 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by DeistPaladin - August 24, 2010 at 12:47 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by downbeatplumb - August 24, 2010 at 3:17 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by downbeatplumb - August 23, 2010 at 2:13 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by leo-rcc - August 23, 2010 at 11:06 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by annatar - August 21, 2010 at 9:05 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by fr0d0 - August 21, 2010 at 9:51 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Minimalist - August 21, 2010 at 9:57 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Minimalist - August 22, 2010 at 1:22 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Edwardo Piet - August 22, 2010 at 12:55 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Tiberius - August 22, 2010 at 7:04 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Edwardo Piet - August 22, 2010 at 5:30 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Entropist - August 22, 2010 at 6:14 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Tiberius - August 22, 2010 at 5:37 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Minimalist - August 22, 2010 at 8:28 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Cego_Colher - August 23, 2010 at 7:06 am
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Godschild - August 23, 2010 at 6:31 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Minimalist - August 23, 2010 at 7:26 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Minimalist - August 23, 2010 at 9:03 pm
RE: Reverse Pascals Wager - by Captain Scarlet - August 24, 2010 at 9:00 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Problem with Pascal's Wager Rhondazvous 45 9586 May 11, 2018 at 7:27 am
Last Post: brewer
  A response to "upping the ante" on pascals wager Won2blv 26 5537 April 12, 2016 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Won2blv
  Atheist version of Pascal's wager Nihilist Virus 57 13913 February 4, 2016 at 3:07 pm
Last Post: RobbyPants



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)