My blog

[robvalue]

Thanks Nestor, yes that would be helpful. I've realized it's a bit of a mixed bunch I have there, fallacies and dishonest tactics. I wanted to keep them together because they're the kind of thing that keep coming up.

I was thinking of changing the title to "logical fallacies / dishonest practices" what do you think?

@Tim: where do you stand on the issue of Paul? Carrier maintains that he was referring entirely to a different mythical jesus, a celestial one, and not at all to the human. He thinks the human references are forged letters. Would you agree?

---

@pizza: yeah I did think of that. I thought it would be more friendly and accessible to have my own descriptions and all in one place. What do other people think, are my descriptions any good or should I just have links to other pages for the explanations?

Been very tired the last few days so not been able to add anything, but I hope to work on it again soon.