(March 6, 2015 at 6:54 pm)Aractus Wrote:(March 6, 2015 at 12:29 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: They're compensating the artists, exactly as I had suggested, and that contributes to the "optimistic news" mentioned in your article.The main part I disagreed with was the end part of Cato's post: "I don't see how any of it legitimizes theft." If that's the way that you look at it, I don't see how you can come up with solutions to the problem!
I'm unsure why you prefaced this post with "Really?", though. We're in agreement.
Don't you agree that taking someone's work without their being compensated is theft?
The law certainly does; that is exactly why it is called intellectual property.