(March 10, 2015 at 11:27 am)Norman Humann Wrote: Special pleading.
Circular reasoning.
I'm going to try explaining this to you one more time. Try real hard to concentrate, okay?
We are not talking about proving anything in the real world. The topic at hand is an interpretation of a particular Scripture. There is no evidence to be discussed, in any way shape or form. This is not the same as providing proof for God's existence, it is an entirely separate argument.
One cannot simply say "this Scripture means that," provide nothing other than opinion, and then criticize another for pointing out that they are logically mistaken based on precedents and antecedents in the very same book which that person originally quoted. It has nothing to do at all with circular reasoning or special pleading.
