RE: Pedophilia in Christianity
March 21, 2015 at 9:48 pm
(This post was last modified: March 21, 2015 at 9:55 pm by SteelCurtain.)
Since you are so fond of definitions, Huggy, I'll throw this one at you:
If anything, we are talking about an ephebophile in Milk, not a pedophile. When we are talking about pedophile priests, we are talking about men who molested pre-pubescent or pubescent boys. There were ephebophilic and hebephilic priests as well. In my opinion, there is a distinction of degree here. If you molest a 10 year old, I think differently of that crime than a person who has sex with a 16-18 year old. I still think it's awful for a 30+ year old to take advantage of a teenager, but I do think it's different. There are reasons the law treats these crimes differently as well.
Now, I don't say any of this to excuse Milk's actions. The age of consent in California at the time was 18, what he did was illegal. He had a history of taking advantage of teenagers with substance abuse problems. That made him a predator in my book. I would say the same of a straight man who did the same to teenage girls. His homosexuality had nothing to do with it. He was privately not so good a person.
It is difficult to separate the two, but he still did amazing things for society. That cannot be taken away. Some of his actions deserve to be celebrated.
Wikipedia Wrote:Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger.[1][2] As a medical diagnosis, specific criteria for the disorder extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.
If anything, we are talking about an ephebophile in Milk, not a pedophile. When we are talking about pedophile priests, we are talking about men who molested pre-pubescent or pubescent boys. There were ephebophilic and hebephilic priests as well. In my opinion, there is a distinction of degree here. If you molest a 10 year old, I think differently of that crime than a person who has sex with a 16-18 year old. I still think it's awful for a 30+ year old to take advantage of a teenager, but I do think it's different. There are reasons the law treats these crimes differently as well.
Now, I don't say any of this to excuse Milk's actions. The age of consent in California at the time was 18, what he did was illegal. He had a history of taking advantage of teenagers with substance abuse problems. That made him a predator in my book. I would say the same of a straight man who did the same to teenage girls. His homosexuality had nothing to do with it. He was privately not so good a person.
It is difficult to separate the two, but he still did amazing things for society. That cannot be taken away. Some of his actions deserve to be celebrated.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---