RE: If God was Schrodinger's Cat
March 21, 2015 at 11:21 pm
(This post was last modified: March 21, 2015 at 11:36 pm by daver49.)
(March 21, 2015 at 10:06 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:(March 21, 2015 at 9:32 pm)daver49 Wrote: The name "Schrodinger's cat" was referring to the name of the thought experiment he devised in 1935, not the cat itself. But I can go with how you understood it. Using your understanding, he can be the dude's cat (Schrodinger's) and he can be the cat at the same time (the cat's name being God). In one case we can understand what is being said by the statement as expressing possession of an object, and on the other hand it can be understood as expressing the object in the box. Other more philosophically minded people can tweak it here...(without applying fire and brimstone please). Is there a quantum physicist out there? He/she could ride shotgun with the philosopher (so as to shoot him/her if the explanation is wrong).
--don't take this game to seriously...it is just for fun.
I'm well aware of Schroedinger's cat. I simply using the opportunity to make a point by fucking with you.
You say you are aware of Schroedinger's cat...so God is alive???
Everybody sing..."Amazing Grace, how sweet the sound...."
(March 21, 2015 at 11:10 pm)The Reality Salesman Wrote: Here's Leviticus with a new cover and a few other twists:
Who is Adolf Sitler? Does it come in soft-cover? Those hard cover books are expensive.
(March 21, 2015 at 10:57 pm)IATIA Wrote:(March 21, 2015 at 8:48 pm)daver49 Wrote: If God was Schroedinger's cat, would God be alive or dead?Cannot work. If the god were dead, then it is not a god.
But it's a cat. So are you saying it is alive?
(March 21, 2015 at 11:00 pm)The Reality Salesman Wrote: I think everybody has taken this question far too seriously. I don't think Dave gives 2 shits about whether or not this question says anything about God. I think he's just having a go...
Do I hear three? That man in the corner....?