If

[Little Rik]

Not at all sur.
I believe that the physical world can not understand the spiritual world because the spiritual world created the physical in the first place.

You forgot to add "because yoga says so."

Yoga give results so by getting results you can say whether it make sense or not.
You never tried the real yoga so you are NOT in a position to judge.
End of the story.

Your avoidance of using current or even older definitions shows you don't know how to communicate your ideas.

If you judge by my bad English than i may understand why you think so but i am sure that even if my English would be perfect you still would find something wrong with what i write.
Sorry pal if i can't make you happy but life may be a bit though when you go against mother nature.
That is your problem not mine.

Society decides what the definitions are. The dictionary only writes them down. If you want to go against society, then there is a white padded room waiting for you.

Wrong again pal.
If someone wouldn't have gone against the main stream there wouldn't be life on earth or we still would be living in caves.
The jails in the countries under dictatorship are full of political prisoners and not only in the places under dictatorship.
People who came up with new ideas are always persecuted but at the end the reason prevail.
Just look at you guys.
In same places atheists are persecuted just because they go against the main stream.
Soon or later however there will be freedom of choosing and nobody will bother you anymore but to achieve this you will have to go against the mainstream.
They may even put you in ........white padded room.

Analogies are not models. A model is much more refined.

Analogies lead to improvements so it is irrelevant whether they are models or not.

Not at all sur.
If my statement is a fallacy than you should show that it is by telling me that the baby can understand what is inside his father mind.
You don't therefore is you that fail not me.

Your rebuttal is even stupider. I don't agree with your inaccurate analogies, and definitely not the conclusions you reach from them.

A perfect excuse for not answering my question.
Nothing new mate.

You are getting lost mate.
Let us stick to these guys.
Before and after this festival their nerves were normal.

You cannot prove any of this. You just wish it to be true.

I did prove to myself by being there and see that.
Why don't you go yourself there and see that so you can have a good reason to believe?