Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 16, 2025, 8:39 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is there really any problem with an infinate regresion of universes?
#34
RE: Is there really any problem with an infinate regresion of universes?
OK, let's look at it closer.
(April 5, 2015 at 1:06 am)Chuck Wrote: Think of an infinite foam.  Let's say if any bubble
As the bubbles are analogous to universes, the foam is analogous to a multiverse. You're giving yourself an infinite number of universes as a starting position. No one bubble needs another for its existence. They're already there.
Quote:in the foam pops, it would destabilize an adjacent bubble and cause that to pop as well.  So each popping of a bubble is attributable to the popping of another bubble in an infinite regression.
Now you're adding popping to dress it up like an infinite regression.
Quote:Yet the popping of any particular bubble does not require its antecedent to unpop.
Yes, but only because you gave yourself a multiverse to begin with.
Quote:In a like manner, the fact that our universe appear to be headed towards some end state wildly different from what appeared to have been its beginning state does not show its beginning is therefore not part of infinite regression.
If you're limiting yourself to what we know - our universe - and not giving yourself an infinite multiverse as a starting point, then yes, you do need a mechanism to get from the end of one universe to the beginning of another.

Further, if you're giving yourself a multiverse, you don't need one universe to be dependent on another. They're already there as a given.

(April 5, 2015 at 8:15 am)Chuck Wrote: And define why it is not?

Either each instantiation itself, or the detaileds of each instantiation, is made possible by a prior instantiation, which in turn depends upon yet another, going back along an infinite chain.  How is that not infinite regression?
See above.
Quote:You just can't admit you didn't, or more likely won't, see how infinite regression - not necessarily true but already too threatening to the canard cited to justify the need for theistic creation bullshit - can be embedded in different flavor a of cosmologies consistent with observation.
A multiverse as a starting point is not "consistent with observation." We have observed exactly one universe.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Is there really any problem with an infinate regresion of universes? - by John V - April 5, 2015 at 9:00 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Creation of universes from nothing. Jehanne 22 4465 November 14, 2018 at 5:46 pm
Last Post: Dr H
  Is there a real chance that there is a multiverse? SerenelyBlue 127 25200 September 15, 2016 at 1:59 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Why I don't believe in parallel universes Napoléon 48 10756 March 24, 2015 at 1:29 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Neptune is REALLY really far away... thesummerqueen 6 1820 September 19, 2011 at 4:09 pm
Last Post: thesummerqueen
  Freaky Physics Proves Parallel Universes Exist Shinylight 21 10421 April 30, 2010 at 6:50 am
Last Post: Loki_999



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)