RE: Pascal's Wager Revisited
April 7, 2015 at 3:03 pm
(This post was last modified: April 7, 2015 at 3:04 pm by Exian.)
It seems you're trying to exclude any one defined religion (in an attempt to simplify and be more inclusive, maybe?), and rephrase the wager in the framework of deism. But you've done nothing to explain why we should exclude all other ideas of god, just like the original wager failed to do. And we still don't know what happens after death, other than decomposition.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue