(April 9, 2015 at 10:24 pm)datc Wrote: If you think the argument that takes as one premise the fact that human beings purposively improve during their entire lives and suggests as conclusion that this struggle is not in vain, that all are not made equal in death, so implausible that in your view, the probability of life after death is zero, then the argument will not work for you.
It is implausible due to the lack of evidence for an afterlife and the evidence against dualism.
Your argument is wishful thinking, pure and simple.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.