RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
April 11, 2015 at 10:14 pm
(This post was last modified: April 11, 2015 at 10:18 pm by Mystic.)
(April 11, 2015 at 10:10 pm)Chas Wrote: Except #7 does not follow. It assumes a being where none has been shown to be required.
The first initial point of time is not eternal. It didn't always exist. The logical conclusion then is that it came into being. It coming into being from nothing is illogical. Something had to always be there. That eternal thing is the only thing that could of cause time to come into being. But without a will and power, it could not have caused it to come into being. Therefore it makes sense it's an eternal being with will and power.
I already showed how I concluded there is a being/creator as a result of time having a start. It doesn't make sense to say "what is more north then the north pole", because in case of time, yes even the very initial point of time needs to come into being. There not being something time wise before it doesn't take out the need of it being caused because it was not always there. So an eternal being needs to cause it.
