RE: Eternal the originator of time - proof.
April 14, 2015 at 7:39 am
(This post was last modified: April 14, 2015 at 7:50 am by Mudhammam.)
Repeating over and over that "time is not eternal because of its nature" is not an argument that time is, in fact, not eternal, or that you have any deeper understanding of its nature other than an intuitive feeling that the past no longer exists in some manner, Mystic. Speaking of parroting...
You're also special pleading because you keep saying that "an infinity of x" is "impossible without y" when "impossible" only means, per your demonstration, "incomprehensible," yet you're willing to make an exception for your admittedly just-as-inconceivable and unknown timeless cause that acts at definite moments in time.
You're also special pleading because you keep saying that "an infinity of x" is "impossible without y" when "impossible" only means, per your demonstration, "incomprehensible," yet you're willing to make an exception for your admittedly just-as-inconceivable and unknown timeless cause that acts at definite moments in time.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
