|
Are Particles 'Physical Things' or 'Abstract Ideas'?
|
 RE: Are Particles 'Physical Things' or 'Abstract Ideas'?
April 14, 2015 at 2:38 pm
(This post was last modified: April 14, 2015 at 2:40 pm by Anomalocaris.)
Since what is "concert and substantial" can never be more than "concert and substantial in theory", it seems to me the distinction between "concert and substantial" and "theoretical and notional" is but an Rbitrary diction based on degree, without fundamental or clear cut difference.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Are Particles Theoretically Tangible? | JairCrawford | 51 | 7951 |
March 30, 2022 at 11:40 am Last Post: The Grand Nudger |
|
| The Physical Jew | Alex K | 31 | 9717 |
June 5, 2017 at 5:21 pm Last Post: Alex K |
|
| What is Meant by "Charge" for Elementary Particles? | Rhondazvous | 20 | 3711 |
February 10, 2016 at 8:58 pm Last Post: Alex K |
|
| A physical argument for an afterlife | GermanAtheist | 26 | 6413 |
March 15, 2015 at 2:56 pm Last Post: Alex K |
|
| Massless Elementary Particles = Bodies of Mass? | Mudhammam | 7 | 2107 |
October 19, 2014 at 9:59 pm Last Post: Alex K |
|
| The Constraints of Physical Law | Mudhammam | 4 | 2558 |
March 26, 2014 at 11:18 am Last Post: Neo-Scholastic |
|
| Religion, and many preconceived ideas .... | KichigaiNeko | 1 | 1403 |
January 26, 2014 at 8:10 am Last Post: Gawdzilla |
|
| Cosmology of the physical universe | Jackalope | 2 | 2325 |
September 8, 2012 at 3:25 am Last Post: Jackalope |
|
| Subatomic Particles Communicating | God | 22 | 12615 |
November 17, 2010 at 4:49 pm Last Post: Lethe |
|
