RE: Are Particles 'Physical Things' or 'Abstract Ideas'?
April 14, 2015 at 8:02 pm
(This post was last modified: April 14, 2015 at 8:21 pm by Anomalocaris.)
Nestor
Define "move". Theories do not consist of grammatical and logical structure? And is the nature of the "particle" dependent upon whether it is thought by whoever to have been animated by waking state unaccompanied by rational label or by dream state accompanied by rational labels?
(April 14, 2015 at 2:38 pm)Chuck Wrote: Since what is "concert and substantial" can never be more than "concert and substantial in theory", it seems to me the distinction between "concert and substantial" and "theoretical and notional" is but an Rbitrary diction based on degree, without fundamental or clear cut difference.The difference is found in how substances move (which are then formulated into theory) and how ideas move (which are formulated into grammatical and logical structure). Think of the difference of pure perception as in a waking state unaccompanied by rational labels, and pure conception as in a dream state accompanied by them.
Define "move". Theories do not consist of grammatical and logical structure? And is the nature of the "particle" dependent upon whether it is thought by whoever to have been animated by waking state unaccompanied by rational label or by dream state accompanied by rational labels?
