Eternal the originator of time - proof.

[Alex K]

True. But you would have to a. gree that many don't find that particular interpretation satisfying...

There are some technical issues with how to properly define probabilities and so on, but apart from that, I think many poeple just think it is not parsimonious and therefore don't like it. I disagree, it's still parsimonious because little needs to be added to the existing theory, and to me it is the most natural one because it keeps the continuous evolution intact and doesn't need to keep an artificial looking distinction between observer and system. Of course it is difficult to live with the philosophical consequences.