(April 17, 2015 at 10:30 pm)noctalla Wrote:(April 17, 2015 at 10:21 pm)Surgenator Wrote: Time would not exist in an absolutely nothing. Since you already consider the possibility of change, you introduced time into the equation. Therefore, you have already assumed something exist and conclude that something exist.
PS. You should learn how to quote properly
'Tis true. I should learn how to quote properly.
While it is true that if there was an absolute nothingness, there would also be no time, I have not presupposed time. I have only presupposed the possibility of time. Until change occurs, there is no time, even if there is potential for change. Did you read my first reply to my post where I outlined a a possible state of existence that postulated properties without events?
The potential for change already assumes a something.
If you want to talk about infinite regression, we can talk about that.
