(April 24, 2015 at 8:34 am)Mezmo! Wrote:(April 21, 2015 at 1:07 pm)Surgenator Wrote: The fifth way is Aquinus trying to sneak intelligence into natural laws. The natural laws are a byproduct of symmetries. For example, translation invariance (this spot over here is no different than that spot over there) -> conservation of momentum. No intelligence is required for the conservation laws to exist.The legal metaphor of natural laws is based on the idea of a law giver. It is appropriate to ask why such laws consistently hold true. The typical atheist answer is that they just do. The more curious and critical response by believers is that there is a cause for each observable fact. This is known as the principle of sufficient reason.
The 'laws' are human-made descriptions of our experience with reality. The legal metaphor is not apt as there is no law-giver.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.