Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 3, 2025, 1:25 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
#10
RE: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
Also, even if you have an accurate translation of words, how the words are interpreted will have changed over time.

Anyone who studies ancient language and culture can tell you that. Actually, you probably know it yourself and don't even realize it. Ever read eh Canterbury Tales, or anything by Shakespeare? There is a reason why you have to take classes to truly even understand these relatively modern works. The way people behaved and thought, their slang, their attitudes towards everyday things, all of these were different just a few hundred years ago than they are today. How different are they a few thousand years ago?

Even a direct translations is NOT a direct translation. Honest lingual historians who study these things admit they cannot know what someone meant, even when they know what someone wrote.
When you read a line from your bible, you interpret it with your modern brain steeped in modern culture, you cannot help it. You are fooling yourself if you think anyone understands what the meaning of ancient texts are. Historians can only make educated guesses. Even trained historians need to work hard, and then they are still only making their BEST GUESS.

For instance, in our own culture, when we say we've gone out of the frying pan into the fire, we aren't talking about cooking or fires at all. Think that's oversimplified? Even a very similar culture speaking the same language can use terms that are untranslatable unless you understand the culture in which it originated.
Go to England and listen to people use some common terms.
I'm off to Bedfordshire...does not mean they are going to Bedfordshire, it means going to bed. Being at Her Majesties Pleasure means nothing about pleasure or serving the Queen, it means going to prison. I need to see a man about a dog.....well, you get the point? No man or dog involved there.

I think most people really don't grasp this. We know that "knowing" another person in the bible may translate to having sex...but only sometimes. Which slang or cultural thoughts are you mistranslating without even knowing it?
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?” 
― Tom StoppardRosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament - by Aroura - May 14, 2015 at 3:07 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Did Jesus call the Old Testament God the Devil, a Murderer and the Father of Lies? dude1 51 10690 November 6, 2018 at 12:46 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Old Testament Prophecy Proof of Jesus Nihilist Virus 45 7777 August 12, 2016 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: Nihilist Virus
  The Immorality of God - Slavery in the Old Testament athrock 307 45303 January 31, 2016 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: Aegon
  Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament Randy Carson 69 18961 October 8, 2015 at 10:51 pm
Last Post: orangedude
  The Utter Irrelevance of the New Testament Whateverist 66 12676 May 24, 2015 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Question of the Greek New Testament Rhondazvous 130 26166 May 19, 2015 at 8:13 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Historical Easter Question for Minimalist thesummerqueen 26 8423 April 5, 2015 at 3:47 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  New Testament arguments urlawyer 185 28749 March 24, 2015 at 5:26 pm
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01
  Reliability of the creation account robvalue 129 15628 January 20, 2015 at 3:48 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Jews and the old testament Vivalarevolution 40 8045 October 21, 2014 at 5:55 am
Last Post: Vivalarevolution



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)