Is this the point you're trying to make yet?
Ok, let's play pretend for a sec that the NT is 100% accurate, Jesus definitely existed and the authors of the gospels were eyewitnesses.
Even if you stretch the credibility of the bible by that much, which is a shitload, it still gets you nowhere. It doesn't support any of the supernatural claims made and doesn't put forward a good argument for the existence of god.
Keep going, but watch out. The leap you're about to take is pretty damn big.
Ok, let's play pretend for a sec that the NT is 100% accurate, Jesus definitely existed and the authors of the gospels were eyewitnesses.
Even if you stretch the credibility of the bible by that much, which is a shitload, it still gets you nowhere. It doesn't support any of the supernatural claims made and doesn't put forward a good argument for the existence of god.
Keep going, but watch out. The leap you're about to take is pretty damn big.