Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 1, 2024, 8:56 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
RE: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
(May 17, 2015 at 3:46 am)Parkers Tan Wrote:
(May 16, 2015 at 11:38 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: It's Greek > English. No intermediate steps.

How do you know you have the original Greek texts?

I included the Randy quote, since I can't be bothered to look up the original that was posted overnight.

But it's much more complicated than determining if the Greek texts are original. In one of my earlier posts, which Randy ignored, I said that I don't expect the campfire tales building the foundations of the Greek texts, being in Greek. The authors, whoever they were, since the historicity of the names they go by cannot be confirmed, collected tales that were floating around at the time and the region. So if they reached the region or regions where these authors were based, they already made quite a lenghty journey from ear to ear and probably got embellished with every person telling them before someone sat down to write about it.

And then we enter the scientific field again, with the definition the word history and it's understanding had in these days. Ehrman brushes over the fact, that history wasn't what we understand it to be today. It was meant to paint an ideal and less a collection of facts. Actually facts don't play any role in these days. It was mostly oral history, collections of texts that cam earlier, but without checking their authenticity as we would do today. That's true for the Roman and Greek historians of the day and that's certainly true for the authors of the NT, whom we don't even know as historic persons.

And that leads me again to the fundamental question of why. Why did they sit down and write about what they heard? Most people couldn't write at the time, so we're already talking about an elite. And then, why did they write in Greek? Well, maybe it's as simple as the authors actually being greek, but it's well to remember that Greek played the same role French did in the 18th century. It was the language of the elites. Next, in these days, it wasn't that everybody could pick up a sheet of paper and a pen and scribble at their leisure. The materials were expensive and not available to everyone. So maybe it was a commissioned work that someone paid scribes to do.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament - by abaris - May 17, 2015 at 6:51 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Did Jesus call the Old Testament God the Devil, a Murderer and the Father of Lies? dude1 51 9107 November 6, 2018 at 12:46 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Old Testament Prophecy Proof of Jesus Nihilist Virus 45 6843 August 12, 2016 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: Nihilist Virus
  The Immorality of God - Slavery in the Old Testament athrock 307 38291 January 31, 2016 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: Aegon
  Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament Randy Carson 69 17172 October 8, 2015 at 10:51 pm
Last Post: orangedude
  The Utter Irrelevance of the New Testament Whateverist 66 11243 May 24, 2015 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Question of the Greek New Testament Rhondazvous 130 23155 May 19, 2015 at 8:13 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Historical Easter Question for Minimalist thesummerqueen 26 7718 April 5, 2015 at 3:47 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  New Testament arguments urlawyer 185 23592 March 24, 2015 at 5:26 pm
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01
  Reliability of the creation account robvalue 129 13461 January 20, 2015 at 3:48 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Jews and the old testament Vivalarevolution 40 7286 October 21, 2014 at 5:55 am
Last Post: Vivalarevolution



Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)