RE: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
May 17, 2015 at 6:54 pm
(This post was last modified: May 17, 2015 at 6:57 pm by Randy Carson.)
(May 17, 2015 at 5:49 pm)Esquilax Wrote: [quote='Randy Carson' pid='944400' dateline='1431897756']
In post #131, I simply mentioned that Craig had written an extensive article in response to Hume in the event that robvalue wanted to hear an alternative perspective on the supernatural and on Hume specifically.
I have not used Craig to establish the reliability of the NT.
Therefore, what you think of WLC is irrelevant to this thread.
'Nuff said.
(May 17, 2015 at 6:14 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
Wrong again.
The Bible is truth because it is inspired, and we can know that it is inspired because and infallible Catholic Church says so, and we know that the Catholic Church is infallible NOT because an inspired text so but because a historically reliable text says so.
That's very different.