Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 6, 2025, 8:18 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
RE: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament
(May 23, 2015 at 12:42 pm)robvalue Wrote: I don't care if they are reliable. I already told you, I would concede they are the most reliable people ever. It makes no difference.

I gave you exactly the same scenario, with your 10 most reliable people in the world, and you take the same position as me. Scepticism. The only difference is you already believe certain claims, and you're trying to make a special case why they should just be taken at face value.

All religions claims are equal: they make supernatural claims, and they provide no credible evidence.

I don't know how many more times I can say this, but even if they think they are writing the truth, it doesn't mean they are interpreting the events accurately. So no, if the most reliable men on the planet got up in court and said Jesus just visited them and told them to kill someone, so they did, they would not believe them. No matter how much they thought it was true, believed it was true, the court would not accept it. Would you? Clearly this "reliable" property only matters if the claims are ones that you have already decided are true. Otherwise, people are simply mistaken, according to you. Can you see there is a problem here? These 4 reliable men, from your own scenario, could stand up in court and say say Islam is true. Yet you don't believe them. Now we should be sceptical.

Rob-

If 10 men told a court that Jesus told them to kill, then we would dismiss them for a number of reasons not the least of which is the fact that murder is a crime. Period.

However, if they testified that Jesus had told them to become Muslims, then I would be skeptical on the basis of what I know OF JESUS. IOW, because what they are claiming contradicts Jesus himself, I would be doubtful.

How do the claims of Christianity contradict what you already know of God?

As a weak atheist, I'm guessing that you have no personal experience of God, so what exactly is the basis for your position? Lack of evidence? And when evidence is presented, you say, "Oh, that doesn't count" and you go on your merry way thinking that there is no evidence.

Seems to me that maybe you don't WANT to hear any evidence?   Lalala
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Historical Reliability of the New Testament - by Randy Carson - May 23, 2015 at 12:54 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Did Jesus call the Old Testament God the Devil, a Murderer and the Father of Lies? dude1 51 11858 November 6, 2018 at 12:46 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Old Testament Prophecy Proof of Jesus Nihilist Virus 45 8647 August 12, 2016 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: Nihilist Virus
  The Immorality of God - Slavery in the Old Testament athrock 307 51134 January 31, 2016 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: Aegon
  Richard Dawkins and the God of the Old Testament Randy Carson 69 20192 October 8, 2015 at 10:51 pm
Last Post: orangedude
  The Utter Irrelevance of the New Testament Whateverist 66 13881 May 24, 2015 at 6:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Question of the Greek New Testament Rhondazvous 130 28626 May 19, 2015 at 8:13 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Historical Easter Question for Minimalist thesummerqueen 26 9096 April 5, 2015 at 3:47 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  New Testament arguments urlawyer 185 33241 March 24, 2015 at 5:26 pm
Last Post: The Reality Salesman01
  Reliability of the creation account robvalue 129 17577 January 20, 2015 at 3:48 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Jews and the old testament Vivalarevolution 40 8904 October 21, 2014 at 5:55 am
Last Post: Vivalarevolution



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)