(May 30, 2015 at 4:11 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:(May 30, 2015 at 12:29 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: What's funny is two of the four are not even attributed to "eye-witnesses", taking Christian claims of authorship at face value. Mark was no witness and neither was Luke. Luke even says so in his opening.
What does Luke say?
Quote:And Mark was the original, on which Matt and Luke were clearly based.
Who was Mark's source?
Mark was one of Paul's disciples. So Paul was Mark's source.