The Historical Reliability of the New Testament

[dyresand]

You don't need to be a genius or have a degree from Oxford or even knight hood to know that the NT is bullshit. 
It's a great piece of literature but something no one should follow. The bible is fiction always has always will be.

You do realize that this is just an assertion, right?

Will you be making an argument in support of your claim?

1. The jesus story is completely hearsay. How would the bible authors know of a jesus or the fact that he lived.
The other thing they got the cross wrong the cross itself is nothing special hell they even got that wrong.
What jesus would have actually been on.

The other thing no one knows the true birth date for jesus nor the day. And christ doesn't belong in christmas.
Pagan holiday to get your grove on and make babies. Its a fertility celebration if anything not to do with jc at all. 
Even more damming evidence against the bible is the spread of christianity. The other thing we are talking about
people who believed in magic their and your side has to prove that magic exists before you can prove a god exists.
Mary having birthed the son of god because god impregnated her seems legit... legitimately stupid. 
 
2. Creation story debunked i don't need to even go into that part. Google it youtube it search it up on yahoo. 

3. jesus coming back

2,000+ years later still no sign of him, well that's because he never existed.

3. jesus is no one special there was other jesus like figures before him in other mythologies. 

4.  god is good, no he isn't anyone that is completely rational would see that the fucker is bad. 

5. Archaeology really heavily disproves the bible. You need proof outside of the bible to prove that it is true. The bible itself has no basis in reality 
that is were religion fails and will continue to fail.

6. History. 

I'm not claiming anything reality proves you wrong and in general theists wrong.