Why be good?

[Esquilax]

Why is what the authors of the gospels wrote about the things they saw any less credible than the things you wrote about (highlighted above for clarity)?

Alternatively, why should we give you the benefit of the doubt - and take you at your word - but not do the same with Matthew, Mark, Luke and John?

Can you explain what makes YOUR write up of YOUR personal experiences more believable than theirs?

You know, you could keep asking these questions, or, you could go back and see the answers to them that have existed here since yesterday, twenty minutes after you first posed this point. I mean, you've definitely already read them, you deleted all of them bar the first and last line of my post for a quote earlier, so what gives, continuing to pretend that they haven't been given?

That's lie number three.