I'm always aware of the increase of words like "eye-witness" when discussing the NT. It's as if as time went on, and civilizations evolved and grew, the writers were aware of the need for witnesses for the sake of believability. A thing that is missing from earlier writings in the OT, as if there was a time where simply asserting something was good enough. You'll notice nobody talks about a witness when discussing Adam and Eve talking to a Snake, or god separating night and day. Its as if things were just accepted, but by the early centuries C.E., suddenly we see qualifying situations.
But, that's the OT. That's completely different than the NT. Nobody believes that nonsense.
But, that's the OT. That's completely different than the NT. Nobody believes that nonsense.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
