RE: Stump the Christian?
June 10, 2015 at 6:20 pm
(This post was last modified: June 10, 2015 at 6:25 pm by Randy Carson.)
(June 10, 2015 at 9:32 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(June 10, 2015 at 9:28 am)Randy Carson Wrote: Nope.
Just the idea that a sovereign God can, has and does interact with His creation occasionally as He deems appropriate.
In ways that we can't measure, test, or verify?
Bingo.
You can't. Consequently, science can have nothing to say regarding the existence of God.
(June 10, 2015 at 10:47 am)LastPoet Wrote:(June 10, 2015 at 9:28 am)Randy Carson Wrote: Nope.
Just the idea that a sovereign God can, has and does interact with His creation occasionally as He deems appropriate.
You are, full of shit. That is the truth.
Silly Euro. You crack me up.
(June 10, 2015 at 10:48 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(June 10, 2015 at 10:45 am)SteveII Wrote: Where science contradicts either of them, then the premise was wrong. The debate comes as to what science has contradicted. It cannot comment on God, it cannot comment on the existence of things outside our universe, it cannot comment on whether God acts within our universe, and it cannot comment on existence of consciousness, an eternal soul, morality, heaven or hell.
So...when there's a conflict between science and theological claims, science is wrong?
And if we can't verify or test or measure or examine something, why the hell would you ever believe in it?
Can science verify the existence of everything?
