(June 11, 2015 at 11:56 am)SteveII Wrote:(June 11, 2015 at 11:33 am)Esquilax Wrote: Sure, though the way you've configured it now is no proof for your god at all. Which I think is the point; indirect, weak arguments are all that can be proposed for christianity, if one concerns themselves with factual accuracy when they make them.
Although I am not conceding that the arguments for Christianity are all weak, wouldn't a serious of even weak arguments, that are not scientifically refuted, serve as the basis for a reasonable belief system.
You haven't presented any evidence for the existence of a god. You said you had evidence but we haven't seen that evidence yet. If I'm wrong about the existence of a god I want to know, so tell me what evidence there is for the existence of a god.
