(June 12, 2015 at 9:40 am)Neimenovic Wrote: Your continous misrepresentation of this situation is absolutely infuriating. You really are that dense.
Read the bolded part of your own post very carefully, Dripsy.
Quote:The law requires an employer or other covered entity to reasonably accommodate an employee's religious beliefs or practices, unless doing so would cause more than a minimal burden on the operations of the employer's business .
And now, read this part of the OP, paying extra special attention to the bolded sentence:
(June 10, 2015 at 3:40 am)Pandæmonium Wrote: We got down to the details of the role, which included every month working a Saturday or a Sunday with a day off in the week or time in lieu. She flat out refused to work the Sunday citing her religious observance as the reason why: "I have to observe my religion which I'm very passionate about, so I cannot work Sunday's under any circumstances."
This put the cleaning manager under quite some strain as we need cleaners to fill these posts (there is actually a shortage of good cleaners in our local job market apparently), but this was causing bother as we have several other cleaners who'd love to be exempt From working Sunday's but who have also been told they must work.
Case. Dismissed.
Keep reading monkey man.. The paragraph includes examples. Those examples specifically dictate that scheduling days off to conside with religious beliefs is indeed to be considered to be a " a minimal burden on the operations of the employer's business."
In this case the government sets the standard on what is and is not to be a minimal burden, not the OP or you! This law specifically allows (in this case) the right for a cleaning lady to have a sunday off to goto Church. Why? Because again to do so according to the goverment does indeed fall into the term "minimal burden" to make such an allowance.